Saudi Prince Al Faisal admits: Our curriculum produces terrorists

| Email this entry |   | Comments (9) | TrackBacks (0)

Alarabiya (Saudi owned TV channel)

January 24, 2008

Prince Al Feisal.jpg

Translated from Arabic.

Saudi Prince Mohammad Al Abdallah Al Faisal called today,  in an interview with Turki El Dakheil, famous host for the popular Saudi Arabian (Arabiya channel) TV talk show Eda’at (Enlightment), for “changing the education philosophy in Saudi Arabia”. Adding “our curriculum produces terrorists”.  

Prince Al Faisal was the deputy Minister for education until he resigned in 1983.

“Education in Saudi Arabia suffers from a big problem. One day I went to the Minister of education Hassan El Sheikh, and told him, ‘The religious books we teach are the books of Sheikh Mohamed Ben Abdel Wahab (the founder of - Wahabism) and we should change their interpretations and  understanding for the student ” he told Al Dakheil.

He continued, “I am not happy with the level and results of education in the Kingdom, and I personally sent my children after their middle school to study abroad .. Since we realized from experience that our curriculums produced terrorists who went and blew themselves up ..  we have to find out how to get our students out of that path”.

Comment:

There is a widespread misconception in the minds of the Western public at large, that Wahabism is a Saudi invention of a new radicalized interpretation of Islam by Mohamed Ben Abdel Wahab in the 18th century. This misconception was popularized by two groups of Western scholars. The first group acted out of good faith but based their conclusion on unsubstantiated differences between the Wahabi Islam and the fundamental Islamic texts.  The second group acted out of deception and diversion. To absolve mainstream Islam from any link with radical Muslim terrorists, and to divert people scrutiny away from Islam to the scapegoat of Wahabi Islam.

 So why is Wahabi Islam perceived as the most radicalized Islam? And where is the truth in this popularized confusion?

We’ll explain this in very simple terms based on Islamic history and sources.

After the 3rd Caliphe Osman ebn Af’fan, Islam was spread in many countries due to the Islamic invasions and conquests. Through the years, two factors contributed, if we may say, in replacing the barbarity of the Shari’a laws with civil laws. The 1st factor was the interaction of Islam with the civilizations and cultures that Islam conquered mainly Christians, and the natives that were forced to convert to Islam resisted the application of these barbaric laws as well. The second factor was the colonization of most of what used to be the Islamic countries of the defunct Ottoman Empire, except Saudi Arabia that held no interest for Western European powers at the time. We can consider the era of colonization, starting with Napoleon's expedition to be an era of a de facto moderate Islam in the major countries of the Middle-East like Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, the Maghreb (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia), etc… that adopted to a great degree a modernized lifestyle and democratic legislative institutions inherited from the colonizing power.

 Wahabism is a conservative 18th century reform movement of Sunni Islam founded by Muhamed ben Abd-al-Wahhab, after whom the movement is named. Wahhabism formed the creed upon which the kingdom of Saudi Arabia was founded and is the dominant form of Islam found in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar, as well as some pockets of Somalia, Algeria and Mauritania  

Wahhabi theology treats the Kuran and Hadith as fundamental texts, interpreted upon the understanding of the first three generations of Islam and further explained by many various commentaries and the works of the earlier scholar Ibn Taymiyya, who sought the return of Islam to its sources, the Qur'an and the Sunnah.

Ibn Taymiyyah strongly opposed borrowing (knowledge, customs, etc..) from Christianity or other non-Muslim religions. In his text On the Necessity of the Straight Path (kitab iqtida al-sirat al-mustaqim) he preached that the beginning of Muslim life was the point at which ` A perfect dissimilarity with the non-Muslims has been achieved.

In other words, Wahabism is nothing more than, as it is called in evangelism, a “Revival” of Islamic orthodoxy practiced as in the time of Mohammad and his first three companions", using the same interpretations of the historical Islamic interpreters which have been approved by every Sunni Islamic authority.  

You can challenge any Scholar to show you any Wahabi interpretation that would differ from what is taught now at any Sunni institution, starting by the most prominent Al Azhar University in Cairo.

Conclusion: Wahabism is the TRUE Islam.  

According to a tacit agreement that sealed the power sharing in Saudi Arabia between the founder of the dynasty Ebn Saud and Mohamed ebn Abdel Wahab, the educational system has been in the grip of the Wahabi religious authority.

Mr. Bush and his administration can talk about the reform progress of the Saudi educational curriculum with all the optimism they want. As long as the Wahabi Islam is the prerequisite cornerstone of that curriculum, not only for the Saudi’s consumption, but exported all over the world including in America’s madrasas and mosques, you can rest assured that we’ll never run out of suicide bombers. What more proof do we need than today’s declarations from a high profile member of the royal family and a former deputy Minister of education?  

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Saudi Prince Al Faisal admits: Our curriculum produces terrorists.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.sonsofapesandpigs.org/cgi/mt/mt-tb.cgi/31

9 Comments

Does not the House of Saud oversee and control the curriculum? If so, what's the big surprise that the curriculum in Wahhabist in orientation?

That admission about the curriculum producing terrorists is a devastating one. Still, President Bush cuddles up to the Saudis. Ugh!

David Paddock said:

Thank you for your description of Whahabism. The likness to Evangelism and/or the return to the basic texts is, I think, very helpful. Why we continue to rub elbows with the House of Saud is quite beyond me.

daralharb Author Profile Page said:

Ibn what is your take on this as concerning the Muslim Brotherhood? I know the Muslim Brotherhood (Ihwhan ) are who put the house of saud on the map but how have they gone from saudi arabia to egypt or do you believe they are still very much in Saudi arabia.I mean i know they are all over the world like 70 countries if i am not mistaken.

Basicly i am wondering what is your view on the muslim brotherhood of today and what do you believe thier roll is in what's going on today?

I do know about the "Project" and the "Grand jihad" ,the 20 yr plane concieved by the Muslim Brotherhood but i am wanting your vision on it.

hal said:

Any intelligent person, anywhere, can easily see that Whahabism is the true form of Islam, and that Ben laden is exactly right in his interpretations of it. He is dead right on. But we can't say that can we? Oh no, that would make us "RELIGIOUSLY INCORRECT". We must never, ever, think or even faintly speculate, that there is such a thing on this planet as a mainstream religion that is totally, and unfixably, evil and psychotic, having the power to corrupt any of it's followers to the point that they might blow themselves up with a lot of innocent people in order to get 72 nine-year old virgins to bleed and cry nightly!

hal said:

remember that there is no religion in the world that makes a basic, doctrinal statement that is definitively and clearly Anti-Christ, except for Islam. As a big and central and main doctrine, Islam says infallibly that Jesus Christ is not the Son of God, and He is not divine, and He did not die on the cross and redeem mankind, and, in so doing offered all of mankind an opportunity to become a member of the intimate family of God , with God Himself as Father, and Jesus Christ as first born son. I mean.., how Anti-Christ can you get? Why is it no one will point out that you can't get anymore anti-Christ than the Muslims? Are they waiting for someone or some bible other than the Koran or your average Muslim to be even more anti-Christ? Don't they see that to be more anti-Christ is totally impossible? Never do I see or hear this truth because we are sohhhhh Religiously Correct that we do not even see what is right in front of our noses.

hal said:

THE ANTICHRIST, the one and only Mr. Antichrist, get it?

krishna109 Author Profile Page said:

''As long as the Wahabi Islam is the prerequisite cornerstone of that curriculum, not only for the Saudi’s consumption, but exported all over the world including in America’s madrasas and mosques, you can rest assured that we’ll never run out of suicide bombers. What more proof do we need than today’s declarations from a high profile member of the royal family and a former deputy Minister of education?''

Here's another indication of just how deeply the indoctrination has permeated their society. A video of a ''man in the street'' type interview in which people are asked ''Would You Shake Hands With A Jew?'' The answers provide some interesting insights into Saudi attitudes and beliefs.
http://adeeperlookweblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/shake-hands-with-jew-would-you-video.html

James bright said:

Your blog make me chuckle from beginning to end^_^!! It sounds absolutely great to me. Your blog is my favorite one!

Kelly, said:

From the beginning your blog seemed pretty dull for me. But now it keeps getting better. THIS post is just AWESOME!

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by ibn Misr published on January 25, 2008 3:46 AM.

Husband cut off wife’s ears, nose on Eid "The Feast of sacrifices" day - The graphic Koran was the previous entry in this blog.

Know your enemies: If you think words cannot kill ... Listen to the sheikhs is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.