Autopsy of Main Stream Media Islamic Disinformation - A Case Study From Fox News
This was published today in Foxnews.com
Report: Non-Muslims Deserve to Be Punished
Tuesday, April 01, 2008
Fox News
A report posted on Islam Watch, a site run by Muslims who oppose intolerant teachings and hatred for unbelievers, exposes a prominent Islamic cleric and lawyer who support extreme punishment for non-Muslims — including killing and rape.
A question-and-answer session with Imam Abdul Makin in an East London mosque asks why Allah would tell Muslims to kill and rape innocent non-Muslims, including their wives and daughters, according to Islam Watch.
"Because non-Muslims are never innocent, they are guilty of denying Allah and his prophet," the Imam says, according to the report. "If you don't believe me, here is the legal authority, the top Muslim lawyer of Britain."
The lawyer, Anjem Choudary, backs up the Imam's position, saying that all Muslims are innocent.
Click here to watch the interview with Islamic lawyer Anjem Choudary.
"You are innocent if you are a Muslim," Choudary tells the BBC. "Then you are innocent in the eyes of God. If you are not a Muslim, then you are guilty of not believing in God."
Choudary said he would not condemn a Muslim for any action.
"As a Muslim, I must support my Muslim brothers and sisters," Choudary said. "I must have hatred to everything that is not Muslim."
Click here to read the report from Islam Watch.
First: Non-muslims deserve to be punished. Sounds like an understatement compared to: deserve to be killed and their women raped, which are the terms used in Islam Watch posting. The word "punished" is not used.
Let's assume that for Foxnews it's an unvolontary trivial question of terminology.
Second: That's our focus. Foxnews.com present the report from Islam Watch (which is an anti-islam site we support, listed in our links section, and also feature some of our articles - i.e. here, here, and here), as if it is simply a case of a radical cleric-lawyer, namely the thug anjem chaudary, sanctioning the killing and raping of non-mulims.
But the "question and answer" report, of our dear and anti-jihadist valued and very knowledgeable sister Ayesha Ahmad, provided in no unequivocal terms, the proof that this killing and raping business is sanctioned by no other than islam's thug in chief, mohammad himself. And that vital information, Foxnews didn't see it was newsworthy of mentioning. To inform their valued readers, that the founder of islam is nothing but a butcher killer and a rapist, let alone his other occupations as a robber and pedophile. In short, a beast in the form of a human being, and that's the most honorable standard that every muslim longs to emulate. You don't need more than that to figure out his followers.
This is the original report by Aesha ahmad on Islam Watch
Naqabi Woman: “One eyed hooked Imam Hamza Mesri said muslims can kill British infidels and have sex with their wives and daughters, Do you agree with him?”
Imam: “It is not what Imam Hamza said nor is there a question of my agreeing with him or not. It is in Quran thus those are Allah’s orders.”
- N.W.: “But why would Allah tell muslims to kill and rape innocent non muslims?”
Imam: “Because Non-muslims are never innocent, they are guilty of denying Allah and his prophet. If you don’t believe me, here is the legal authority, the top muslim lawyer of Britain, Anjem Choudhary.”
N.W. “ But our Prophet was sent as a mercy for all the humanity; he never hurt any body in his life”
Imam: “Yes he never hurt a muslim in his life. But Allah said non-muslim are lowest beasts and worst creatures in ayas 8.22,8.55,95.5 and 98.6 and muslims are ordered to kill them."
N.W.:” But did prophet approve of killing them and raping their wives?”
Imam: “Yes he did. He not only approved of such acts, he and his sahabas practiced it regularly under Allah’s orders. He was helpless in it... If you don’t believe me , you have to believe sahih hadiths. I will quote you two hadiths about his typical day after a raid. These hadiths are about the raid on jewish village Khaibar whose chief was Kinana who had gorgeous 17 year old wife Safia. Prophet tortured and beheaded Kinana in front of Safia and raped her all night afterwards.
- Sahih Bukhari, volume 5, Book 59, Number 512: Narrated Anas: Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their men killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkalbi but later on she belonged to the Prophet (prophet took her away from him after giving Dahya two women and five men in exchange for Safia, Ref. Sahih Muslim 8:3328) .
- Sirat e Rasulullah, Ibn Hisham, page 766 “Safiyah was captured in the Khaibar raid and was claimed by the apostle as his share of booty.. She was then seventeen. She was groomed and made-up for the Prophet by Umm Sulaim, the mother of Anas ibn Malik. They spent the night there. In the early dawn, the Prophet suspected some movement near the tent) . He went out to enquire and saw Abu Ayyub.. He asked him what he was doing near his tent. He replied: "I was afraid for you with this young lady. You had killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives, and till recently she was an unbeliever. I was really afraid for you on her account and was guarding you." The Prophet prayed for Abu Ayyub al-Ansari (Ibn Hisham, p. 766)
The description of the steamy all night action between the 62 year old Prophet and teenage Safia left the niqabi woman very depressed and the male audience very horny. Imam himself got excited and started thinking about the possibility of killing an infidel and raping his wife, who knows Allah could reward him with paradaise for following in the footsteps of his most beloved apostle..
Imam Abdul, after a lot of thinking and contemplating, figured out that killing is too risky in England. He could end up behind bars for life. Rape is desirable, less risky and more fun. His congregation muslim members could help him in this Islamic duty by providing an alibi that he was preaching in the mosque at the time of the rape (in case he was apprehended).. He talked to them about this favour.. Seven of them agreed to testify for him provided Imam will do the same for them if they got caught themselves for their rape jihad.
The Imam had been lusting for a while on a good looking kafira, who lived alone in the neighbourhood.. Late one night he entered her apartment, captured her at a knife point and brutally raped her. To complete the sunna he took her very expensive computer cell phone as halal booty (aya 8.1).
The woman had seen this weird looking bearded pot bellied Imam walking in and out of the neighbourhood mosque. She reported him to the police and the Imam was nabbed. As promised the seven namazis testified for him and provided the alibi that Imam was preaching at the time of the rape.
But alas! DNA test contradicted their testimony. He and his seven namazi friends were all sentenced to prison terms.
Their burqa-clad wives, present in the court, couldn’t believe this miscarriage of justice. They yelled abuse at the judge for punishing their husbands for practising their religion. They asked why was an act approved by Quran and practiced by holy prophet is punishable in a country which claims freedom of religion? It was clearly a discrimination against muslims and definitely an islamophobia. Now they realized how important it is for muslims to implement sharia in England as suggested by the learned Archbishop.
But Imam Abdul had no regrets. For the first time in his life he had a white woman and in addition he gained a lot of sawab for following in the footsteps of his beloved prophet..
The real losers were the pious namazis who neither could enjoy a kafira nor could gain any sawab (virtue) but ended up in the monkey house (khaya peeya kuch nahin, glass tora, barana)..
Here is the news story from British newspaper The Sun:
Mosque, seven members lied
18 Mar 2008
A Muslim leader who claimed he was preaching at a mosque when he was really carrying out a brutal rape was jailed for ten years yesterday.
Abdul Mukin Khalisadar held a knife to his victim’s throat as he attacked her in her home.
He persuaded seven men to back up his story that he had been in the mosque at the time.
Khalisadar later admitted raping the 27-year-old.
He claimed a substance he took to help with fasting during Ramadan had made him “hyper.”
The preacher forced his way into her home as she got back from a night out, the court was told.
He threatened to kill her — even after she claimed to be pregnant with twins to put him off, prosecutor Simon Carr said.
Khalisadar also stole a mobile from the house in Whitechapel, East London.
He was caught by DNA. Judge Timothy King blasted his “hypocrisy”.
Imam got 7½ years for rape and 2½ for conspiring to pervert justice.
Seven members of East London Mosque admitted perverting justice and got 12 months each.
Burka-clad women in the public gallery yelled abuse at the judge — and one screamed that the victim was a prostitute.
-----
Moral of the story: Momins should only rape in Sharia country as it is risk free there. Sharia law requires four male witnesses to prove a rape.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Autopsy of Main Stream Media Islamic Disinformation - A Case Study From Fox News .
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.sonsofapesandpigs.org/cgi/mt/mt-tb.cgi/75
11 Comments















The Muslims I know all are afflicted with this superstition. They believe, totally, that anyone who has read the Koran for 15 minutes, or had it explained by a knowledgeable Muslim, and still will not believe - cannot see the surpassing beauty and perfection of the Koran, are those predestined by Allah to be sinners forever. The Koran says that humans should never ask why Allah creates them to be unfixably evil - because that would be an evil thing to do. The Koran says, so, it must be so says the Musbots.
A PROPHECY:
This type of Insanity developed through Islam's doctrine, will cause MECCA and MEDINA to develope massive Mushroom clouds, and become glass ashtrays in the desert.
This is the only defence the civilized world has in dealing with this Ideology.
this
Excellent articals, both on Sons of Apes and Pigs and on Islam-Watch. I especially appreciate the references to Bukhari and Sirat as they clearly demonstrate the unsavory character of madman Muhammad.
Assalamau Laikum Ibn,
Do you know the language of Pak ...Urdu...you said
(khaya peeya kuch nahin, glass tora, barana)..
meaning "eat and drank nothing, broke the glass, not filled)
I am impressed....it does not matter that he ate nothing... the Imam got his main meal at the Kaffira and now his just desserts in prison...he is full all right.
"...the Imam got his main meal at the Kaffira..."
What a nice way to look at it naseem, "kaffira", oh, we can all just feel the love.....
The funny thing is, the Musi's are destined to lose.....
Your weapons are inferior, your treatment of women is inferior, your intelligence is inferior, your strength is inferior, and sooner or later, you 'musi-kaffir's' (that's what I call you, because, muhammad was no prophet, he was a FALSE prophet, as the bible warned, YOU are the Godless ones), one day you 'musi-kaffir's' will push too hard and you will get your destiny.
The simple and effective way to stop this is to meet agression with righteous judgement. This will never happen because the English are a nation of pathetic cowards and are consequently having their national carcass picked clean by a people who are shameless and hypocrites.
1) The imam who was only sentenced to ten years must be castrated. He must then be smeared with pig's blood and killed. This must be done publicly. He must die screaming so rapists know "if we rape this will happen to us".
2) The seven liars who backed him up must be castrated also. This extra measure will strike fear into the hearts of criminals.
3) The screaming women, who were the imam's property/cattle, must be arrested for inciting a hate crime.
If the british government would enact these steps and apply them for every rape comitted regardless of the religion of the rapist, I guarantee rapes would vanish very soon.
As for muslims, they are proud to rape non muslims because they know they pretty much don't get punished. Under my steps, they would probably rather remain intact than carry out Mohammed's example, especially since the blood of a pig appears to override their god's affection for them.
Any Muslim who believes this crap deserves to be deported.
Islam believes all nonbelievers should be punished because they are followers of Satan. In fact it is a righteous act for a Muslim "who is a follower of the light" to punish nonbelievers for going against Allah.
Marie, "punish" is not the word they use. Muhammad used a straight forward terminology: kill kill, burn burn, destroy destroy, and rape their women, that was his cry of war, when attacking innocent people's quarters.
Punished, is an understatement. We should use mohammad's terminology, otherwise you'll have the muslims on your back accusing you of corrupting their texts, and taking them out of context. We're dealing with the "context" people.
ibn
Any muslims that tells you he's a muslim and proud of it, that means he believes in his "holy" books, which means he believes every word in it including what we posted. The key that you should notice, is when they say, "they're proud of mohammad." Then it's worth asking them, what makes them proud about mohammad. I can assure you, they won't have much to say. Then you can confront them with his deeds and watch their reactions.
ibn
Hi Nasseem, first allow me to correct your spelling for the islamic greeting. It's: Al salamu Aleikom, phonetically, the L after the A is silent. So it would still be Assalamu Aleikom. Of course you know that the origin of it is Jewish: Shalom Aleikhom. As you see, mohammad took this from the Jews of Arabia. As for Urdu, I have many Pakistani friends that left islam, and I try to pick some words from them, but these words in the article are not mine. They are from another great, and very knowledgeable Pakistani lady, Aeysha Ahmad, an ex-muslim, and now she's telling the world how beautiful mohammad was in abducting and raping women. Btw Nasseem, you commented on the sheikh, but we never heard a peep from you on the "very honorable" prophet that the sheikh was trying to emulate. Actually, the essense of the article was not the sheikh, but mohammad's legacy of raping women. Can you tell us what you think about that beautiful teaching? What you think, as a woman, about rapists in general, which is a big issue for Pakistani women? Can we have your opinion?