The real headline is: Denmark bans Muslim headscarf for judges

But in reality, this is another surrender to muslims blackmail, since the Christian cross, the Jewish skullcap and the Hindu turban will also be banned.

Islam is wining in wiping out any trace of our Judeo-Christian civilization and culture, and even our freedom of belief.

I have no problem with a judge wearing a Jewish skullcap. The Jewish skullcap was never a symbol of a religion calling for the killing or the enslavement of anyone not believing in Moses or Judaism, or calling others sons of apes and pigs.

On the contrary, The Jewish skullcap is a symbol of people that gave the world the most magnificent jurists, judges, legislators, and civil rights lawyers that enriched the civilized laws of the Western world. Their contribution for protecting the rights of freedom and justice for every human being, regardless of his color, religion or race is what made the superiority of Western laws what they are today.

Most of all, the Jewish skullcap is a symbol of the religion that gave the world the Law of all laws, from which all civilized laws were inspired. The Law of, ”Thou shall not kill.”  The Ten Commandments that no law will supersede.

For me, a judge wearing the skullcap gives me a sense of assurance and confidence in the fairness of his justice.

And the skullcap is not only Jewish. The Pope, and all Christian priests, Catholic and Orthodox, wear the same skullcap.

The same thing could be repeated for the Cross, the symbol of ultimate love, Grace and sacrifice. The symbol of the Prince of peace, but also the God of the Ten commandments (for Christians). No one on Earth, starting by muslims, can look at the Cross and not remember the “Love your enemy, and pray for those who persecute you.”

For the Hindu turban, the least I can say is, there is nothing in the Hindus belief that calls for the killing or enslavement of non Hindu people. Despite the substantial Hindu presence in the Western world, we never heard of Hindu Temples or a Hindu book used for plotting to cause death and destruction, or for spreading hate and subversion to apply a Hindu sharia law. On the contrary, their contribution and achievements in all domains for the benefit of all speaks for itself, and is a testimony to what they are. Not to forget that India is the biggest democracy in the world.

Now, can anyone in the world starting by muslims, say that the skullcap, the Cross, and the Hindu turban are symbols of impartiality?

Or can anyone in the world starting by muslims, say that the Islamic hijab, veil, or any Islamic symbol, are not symbols of the only “religion,” that legislated impartiality?   

To help you with the answer, consider this:

Any judge wearing a skullcap or a Cross believes in the teaching of the book, where it is said:

Proverbs 17: 15:
“Acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent— the LORD detests them both.”

A Hindu turban was never a symbol of terror, beheadings, hate and oppression for others, or dividing the world in two camps.

The skullcap, the Cross, the Hindu turban were never ever known to be, or perceived as supremacist symbols.

The skullcap, the Cross, the Hindu turban are not symbols of religions that call to deceive (Taqqiya, Koran 3:28) all other people.

As for headscarves, which is actually a softer westernized name for hijab (like islamist instead of true muslim), it’s the symbol of the most despicable religion of murders, hate, oppression, intolerance, famous throughout history for its masquerade of justice, and immoral flagrant injustice that didn’t even reach the level of the jungle’s law.     

Being a judge doesn’t mean that judges should or will renounce their religion. This is not an opinion; I’m just stating a fact. And the moral basic standard of their religious belief in terms of fairness and justice in applying the law will be the inspiration guiding the conscience of every judge.

How then could a Jew, a Christian or any non muslim, trust a muslim judge, especially when the opposing party in the law suit is a muslim, if the fundamental religious tenets of that judge, and the fairness of justice standard of his/her role model prophet and deity that inspire his/her conscience are:

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 83, Number 50:

Narrated Abu Juhaifa:

“No Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever)."

Koran 9:28, O ye who believe! Truly the Mushrekoon (Jews, Christians, Pagans) are unclean

Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Number 6668:

Abu Burda reported Allah's Messenger (May peace be upon him) as saying: There would come people amongst the Muslims on the Day of Resurrection with as heavy sins as a mountain, and Allah would forgive them and He would place in their stead the Jews and the Christians.

How a hijabed, proud to be a muslima judge, would judge in favor of a non muslim that has been robbed by a muslim, when she has been raised on reciting, Koran 33:27, “And He made you heirs of their (Jews and Christians) lands, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (Before).”

And how could I trust a proud to be a muslima judge, taunting her hijab, which reminds a Jew, a Christian, and a Hindu of their dhimmi status. And curse Jews and Christians 17 times at her daily prayers when she recites Al Fatiha as it is required by a faithful muslima, Koran 1:6,7 “Show us the straightway. The way of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace, those whose (portion) is not wrath (the Jews), and who go not astray (the Christians).” With a good chance that she just recited this prayer right before entering the court room.

The cornerstone doctrine of islam, is to establish the rule of allah on Earth, which is the sharia law that supersedes and aims to abolish every man made law and constitution. Any muslim denying this is simply not a true muslim, and won’t be wearing the most visible symbol of that doctrine, masked as a religion.

It’s the biggest dilemma for a muslim judge in a Western court. We’re talking about a highly educated muslim, not an illiterate. As a side note, the crème de la crème of the who’s who in the world of Islamic fanatics and terror are the highly educated, doctors (that are supposed to save people’s lives), engineers (that are supposed to advance people’s lives), lawyers (that are supposed to protect people’s rights).  They’re the ones that understand the Koran and islam correctly, and who’s better to understand the contradictions between the sharia law and Western laws more than a legal mind of a muslim judge? First, a muslim is indoctrinated from childhood that kafirs are inferior. Second, according to islam and the sharia law (which is the same thing), no kafir can testify against a believer (muslim), in other words kafirs are not equal with muslims under the law. Those two points resume the whole ideology of islam. And a judge with a hijab is obviously a convinced believer in islam.

That leaves a muslim judge two repugnant choices, forced to use laws that are diametrically opposed to islam, made by, “those whose portion is wrath and who went astray. Koran 1:6, 7,” that she prays 17 times a day for allah not to make her ways like them. Or feel betraying her religion and compromise justice.   Both cases are not reassuring, especially in Europe where muslims produce more than 40% of criminals.

Putting a hijabed muslima (a muslim woman) as a judge in any Western court, is like putting a Nazi wearing a swastika to judge Jews and blacks. And putting her without the hijab, it’s still like a Nazi but without the swastika.

Would Western governments make a moral equivalence between the skullcap, the Cross, and the swastika?

Western courts require witnesses to swear on the Bible, but for a muslim judge the Bible is corrupted and unclean. What they gone do about this other catch 22?

All in all, this is not a decision to be cheerful about; this is another Islamic extortion victory to erase the God of the Bible, the archenemy of the islamic allah, and restrict the constitutionality of the freedom of religion that even judges are entitled to, as long as their beliefs never affected their impartiality, and never prejudiced anyone.   

All symbols aside, the Western governments are indulging in the most stupid exercise of dhimmitisation, surrender and very costly errors that would lead to a bolder Islamic communities. This talk about symbols like many other issues, are not the real issue. The real issue is the great taboo of the evil, and subversive teaching of islam , the Koran, that no western government dared to tackle yet.  But for how long more the native populations will take it?